Eritrea vs Finland: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Eritrea
16.6%
in 2019
Finland
16.2%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
171st
Finland rank
174th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Eritrea
- Finland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 16.6% against 16.2% in Finland, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 171st and Finland ranks 174th of 190 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.6% | 13.3% | 3.3% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 15.9% | 0.7% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Eritrea or Finland?
- Eritrea, at 16.6% against 16.2% in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Eritrea and Finland?
- 0.4%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Finland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Finland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Eritrea ranks 171st and Finland ranks 174th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.