Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
19.5%
in 2019
Sudan
19.8%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
157th
Sudan rank
154th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 19.8% against 19.5% in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 154th of 190 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 19.8% | 1.3% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 19.2% | 19.8% | 0.6% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 19.8% against 19.5% in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
- 0.3%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 154th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.