El Salvador vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts: Cost
El Salvador
28.4%
in 2019
Iraq
28.1%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
92nd
Iraq rank
93rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- El Salvador
- Iraq
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 28.4% against 28.1% in Iraq, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
El Salvador ranks 92nd and Iraq ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4% | 31.6% | 3.2% | Iraq |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 28.1% | 0.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, El Salvador or Iraq?
- El Salvador, at 28.4% against 28.1% in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between El Salvador and Iraq?
- 0.3%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Iraq?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- El Salvador ranks 92nd and Iraq ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.