El Salvador vs Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts: Cost
El Salvador
28.4%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
28.0%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
92nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
94th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- El Salvador
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 28.4% against 28.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 92nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4% | 28.0% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 28.0% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, El Salvador or Guinea-Bissau?
- El Salvador, at 28.4% against 28.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- El Salvador ranks 92nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.