Egypt vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Egypt
26.2%
in 2019
Kiribati
25.8%
in 2019
Egypt rank
110th
Kiribati rank
111th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Egypt
- Kiribati
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 26.2% against 25.8% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 110th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.2% | 25.8% | 0.4% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 26.2% | 25.8% | 0.4% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Egypt or Kiribati?
- Egypt, at 26.2% against 25.8% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Egypt and Kiribati?
- 0.4%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kiribati?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Egypt ranks 110th and Kiribati ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.