Ecuador vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Ecuador
27.2%
in 2019
Palestine, State of
27.0%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
99th
Palestine, State of rank
102nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Ecuador
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 27.2% against 27.0% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 99th and Palestine, State of ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.2% | 27.0% | 0.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 27.2% | 27.0% | 0.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Ecuador or Palestine, State of?
- Ecuador, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Ecuador and Palestine, State of?
- 0.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Palestine, State of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Ecuador ranks 99th and Palestine, State of ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.