Ecuador vs Libya: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Ecuador
27.2%
in 2019
Libya
27.0%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
99th
Libya rank
102nd

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Ecuador
  • Libya
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 27.2% against 27.0% in Libya, a difference of 0.2%.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 99th and Libya ranks 102nd of 191 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Ecuador or Libya?
Ecuador, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Libya as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Ecuador and Libya?
0.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Ecuador ranks 99th and Libya ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Libya: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/ecuador/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/ecuador/libya/">Ecuador vs Libya: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.