Denmark vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Denmark
23.3%
in 2019
Japan
23.4%
in 2019
Denmark rank
129th
Japan rank
127th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 23.4% against 23.3% in Denmark, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 129th and Japan ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.7% | 32.2% | 8.5% | Japan |
| 2010s | 23.3% | 26.0% | 2.7% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Denmark or Japan?
- Japan, at 23.4% against 23.3% in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Denmark and Japan?
- 0.1%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Denmark ranks 129th and Japan ranks 127th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.