Czechia vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Czechia
33.8%
in 2019
South Africa
33.2%
in 2019
Czechia rank
64th
South Africa rank
67th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Czechia
- South Africa
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 33.8% against 33.2% in South Africa, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 64th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.9% | 33.2% | 0.7% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 33.8% | 33.2% | 0.6% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Czechia or South Africa?
- Czechia, at 33.8% against 33.2% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Czechia and South Africa?
- 0.6%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Czechia ranks 64th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.