Croatia vs Hungary: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Croatia
15.2%
in 2019
Hungary
15.0%
in 2019
Croatia rank
178th
Hungary rank
181st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Croatia
- Hungary
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 15.2% against 15.0% in Hungary, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hungary ahead.
Croatia ranks 178th and Hungary ranks 181st of 190 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 15.0% | 2.7% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 15.0% | 0.4% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Croatia or Hungary?
- Croatia, at 15.2% against 15.0% in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Croatia and Hungary?
- 0.2%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Hungary?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Hungary rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Croatia ranks 178th and Hungary ranks 181st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.