Congo vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Congo
53.2%
in 2019
Mozambique
53.3%
in 2019
Congo rank
19th
Mozambique rank
18th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Congo
  • Mozambique
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 53.3% against 53.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 19th and Mozambique ranks 18th of 188 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 53.2% 53.3% 0.1% Mozambique
2010s 53.2% 53.3% 0.1% Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Congo or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 53.3% against 53.2% in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Congo and Mozambique?
0.1%, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Congo ranks 19th and Mozambique ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.