Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Democratic Republic of Congo
80.6%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
83.1%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
5th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Zimbabwe
255075100125150200320112019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 83.1% against 80.6% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 2.5%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 188 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 151.8% 32.0% 119.8% Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 101.5% 92.1% 9.4% Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 83.1% against 80.6% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
2.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.