Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Democratic Republic of the Congo
80.6%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
78.9%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
8th
Solomon Islands rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 80.6% against 78.9% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 1.7%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 9th of 190 countries.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 151.8% | 78.9% | 72.9% | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2010s | 101.5% | 78.9% | 22.6% | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Solomon Islands?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 80.6% against 78.9% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 1.7%, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 9th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.