Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Comoros
89.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
83.1%
in 2019
Comoros rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Comoros
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 89.4% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.4% | 32.0% | 57.4% | Comoros |
| 2010s | 89.4% | 92.1% | 2.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
- Comoros, at 89.4% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 6.3%, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Comoros ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.