Comoros vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Comoros
89.4%
in 2019
East Timor
163.2%
in 2019
Comoros rank
4th
East Timor rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Comoros
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 163.2% against 89.4% in Comoros, a difference of 73.8%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.8 times Comoros's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 4th and East Timor ranks 1st of 188 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.4% | 163.2% | 73.8% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 89.4% | 163.2% | 73.8% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Comoros or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 163.2% against 89.4% in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Comoros and East Timor?
- 73.8%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Comoros ranks 4th and East Timor ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.