Comoros vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Comoros
89.4%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
110.3%
in 2019
Comoros rank
4th
Papua New Guinea rank
2nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Comoros
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 110.3% against 89.4% in Comoros, a difference of 20.9%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.4% | 110.3% | 20.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 89.4% | 110.3% | 20.9% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Comoros or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 110.3% against 89.4% in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Comoros and Papua New Guinea?
- 20.9%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Comoros ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.