China (People’s Republic of) vs Eritrea, The State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost
China (People’s Republic of)
16.2%
in 2019
Eritrea, The State of
16.6%
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
174th
Eritrea, The State of rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Eritrea, The State of
How they compare
Eritrea, The State of currently reports 16.6% against 16.2% in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Eritrea, The State of has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 174th and Eritrea, The State of ranks 171st of 190 countries.
Eritrea, The State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Eritrea, The State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.8% | 16.6% | 2.8% | Eritrea, The State of |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 16.6% | 0.7% | Eritrea, The State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, China (People’s Republic of) or Eritrea, The State of?
- Eritrea, The State of, at 16.6% against 16.2% in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between China (People’s Republic of) and Eritrea, The State of?
- 0.4%, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Eritrea, The State of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Eritrea, The State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 174th and Eritrea, The State of ranks 171st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.