Chile vs Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Chile
25.6%
in 2019
Montenegro
25.7%
in 2019
Chile rank
114th
Montenegro rank
113th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Chile
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 25.7% against 25.6% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 114th and Montenegro ranks 113th of 190 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 25.7% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 25.7% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Chile or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 25.7% against 25.6% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Chile and Montenegro?
- 0.1%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Chile ranks 114th and Montenegro ranks 113th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.