Chile vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Chile
25.6%
in 2019
Mauritius
25.0%
in 2019
Chile rank
112th
Mauritius rank
115th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Chile
- Mauritius
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25.6% against 25.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 188 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 16.3% | 9.3% | Chile |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 22.4% | 3.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Chile or Mauritius?
- Chile, at 25.6% against 25.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Chile and Mauritius?
- 0.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Chile ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.