Chile vs Georgia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Chile
25.6%
in 2019
Georgia
25.0%
in 2019
Chile rank
114th
Georgia rank
117th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25.6% against 25.0% in Georgia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Chile ranks 114th and Georgia ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 34.0% | 8.4% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 25.0% | 0.6% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Chile or Georgia?
- Chile, at 25.6% against 25.0% in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Chile and Georgia?
- 0.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Chile ranks 114th and Georgia ranks 117th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.