Central African Republic vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Central African Republic
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 82.0% against 80.6% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 6th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.0% | 151.8% | 69.8% | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
| 2010s | 82.0% | 101.5% | 19.5% | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Central African Republic or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Central African Republic, at 82.0% against 80.6% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Central African Republic and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 1.4%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Central African Republic ranks 6th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.