Cambodia vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Cambodia
103.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
83.1%
in 2019
Cambodia rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Cambodia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 103.4% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 20.3%.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 190 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 102.9% | 32.0% | 70.9% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 103.4% | 92.1% | 11.3% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Cambodia or Zimbabwe?
- Cambodia, at 103.4% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Cambodia and Zimbabwe?
- 20.3%, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Cambodia ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.