Cambodia vs Comoros: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Cambodia
103.4%
in 2019
Comoros
89.4%
in 2019
Cambodia rank
3rd
Comoros rank
4th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Cambodia
- Comoros
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 103.4% against 89.4% in Comoros, a difference of 14.0%.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 3rd and Comoros ranks 4th of 190 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.0% | 89.4% | 13.6% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 103.4% | 89.4% | 14.0% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Cambodia or Comoros?
- Cambodia, at 103.4% against 89.4% in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Cambodia and Comoros?
- 14.0%, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Comoros?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Comoros rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Cambodia ranks 3rd and Comoros ranks 4th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.