Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Burkina Faso
81.7%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
83.1%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Burkina Faso
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 83.1% against 81.7% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.4% | 32.0% | 54.4% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 81.7% | 92.1% | 10.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 83.1% against 81.7% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 1.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Burkina Faso ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.