Brunei Darussalam vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Brunei Darussalam
36.6%
in 2019
Malaysia
37.9%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
52nd
Malaysia rank
49th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 37.9% against 36.6% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 52nd and Malaysia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.6% | 27.5% | 9.1% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 36.6% | 34.8% | 1.8% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Brunei Darussalam or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 37.9% against 36.6% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia?
- 1.3%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 52nd and Malaysia ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.