Botswana vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Botswana
39.8%
in 2019
Peru
41.2%
in 2019
Botswana rank
42nd
Peru rank
40th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Botswana
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 41.2% against 39.8% in Botswana, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 42nd and Peru ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.8% | 41.2% | 1.4% | Peru |
| 2010s | 39.8% | 41.2% | 1.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Botswana or Peru?
- Peru, at 41.2% against 39.8% in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Botswana and Peru?
- 1.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Botswana ranks 42nd and Peru ranks 40th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.