Bolivia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Bolivia
25.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
25.0%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
117th
Mauritius rank
117th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Bolivia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 25.0% against 25.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 117th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 16.3% | 8.7% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 22.4% | 2.6% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Bolivia or Mauritius?
- Bolivia, at 25.0% against 25.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Bolivia ranks 117th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.