Bolivia vs Chile: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Bolivia
25.0%
in 2019
Chile
25.6%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
117th
Chile rank
114th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Bolivia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25.6% against 25.0% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 117th and Chile ranks 114th of 190 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 25.6% | 0.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 25.6% | 0.6% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Bolivia or Chile?
- Chile, at 25.6% against 25.0% in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Bolivia and Chile?
- 0.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Chile?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Chile rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Bolivia ranks 117th and Chile ranks 114th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.