Bhutan vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Bhutan
23.1%
in 2019
Mauritania
23.2%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
133rd
Mauritania rank
130th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Bhutan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 23.2% against 23.1% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 130th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2% | 23.2% | 17.0% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 13.9% | 23.2% | 9.3% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Bhutan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 23.2% against 23.1% in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Bhutan and Mauritania?
- 0.1%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Bhutan ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 130th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.