Benin vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Benin
64.7%
in 2019
Rwanda
64.6%
in 2019
Benin rank
14th
Rwanda rank
15th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Benin
- Rwanda
How they compare
Benin currently reports 64.7% against 64.6% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Rwanda ahead.
Benin ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.7% | 80.5% | 15.8% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 64.7% | 70.6% | 5.9% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Benin or Rwanda?
- Benin, at 64.7% against 64.6% in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Benin and Rwanda?
- 0.1%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Benin ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.