Benin vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Benin
64.7%
in 2019
Malawi
69.1%
in 2019
Benin rank
14th
Malawi rank
11th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Benin
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 69.1% against 64.7% in Benin, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 11th of 188 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.7% | 142.4% | 77.7% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 64.7% | 76.6% | 11.9% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Benin or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 69.1% against 64.7% in Benin as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Benin and Malawi?
- 4.4%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malawi?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Benin ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 11th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.