Belgium vs Spain: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Belgium
18.0%
in 2019
Spain
17.2%
in 2019
Belgium rank
165th
Spain rank
168th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Belgium
- Spain
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 18.0% against 17.2% in Spain, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 165th and Spain ranks 168th of 190 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 17.2% | 0.5% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 17.7% | 0.1% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Belgium or Spain?
- Belgium, at 18.0% against 17.2% in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Belgium and Spain?
- 0.8%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Spain rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Belgium ranks 165th and Spain ranks 168th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.