Belgium vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Belgium
18.0%
in 2019
Estonia
17.3%
in 2019
Belgium rank
165th
Estonia rank
167th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Belgium
- Estonia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 18.0% against 17.3% in Estonia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 165th and Estonia ranks 167th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 17.7% | 0.0% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 20.0% | 2.2% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Belgium or Estonia?
- Belgium, at 18.0% against 17.3% in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Belgium and Estonia?
- 0.7%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Estonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Belgium ranks 165th and Estonia ranks 167th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.