Barbados vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Barbados
19.7%
in 2019
Sudan
19.8%
in 2019
Barbados rank
156th
Sudan rank
154th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Barbados
  • Sudan
05101520200420112019

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 19.8% against 19.7% in Barbados, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 156th and Sudan ranks 154th of 190 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Barbados or Sudan?
Sudan, at 19.8% against 19.7% in Barbados as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Barbados and Sudan?
0.1%, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Barbados and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Barbados ranks 156th and Sudan ranks 154th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/barbados/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/barbados/sudan/">Barbados vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.