Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Bahrain or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Bahrain, at 14.7% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Tanzania, United Republic of?

13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bahrain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Bahrain

14.7%

in 2019

Tanzania, United Republic of

14.3%

in 2019

Bahrain rank

182nd

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

184th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

Bahrain
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 14.7% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.4%.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Bahrain has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 182nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 184th of 190 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bahrain	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	14.7%	14.3%	0.4%	Bahrain
2010s	14.7%	14.3%	0.4%	Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Bahrain or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Bahrain, at 14.7% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Bahrain and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.4%, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Bahrain and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?: Bahrain ranks 182nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 184th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/bahrain/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/bahrain/tanzania/">Bahrain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit: % of claim
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.