Austria vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Austria
20.6%
in 2019
Malta
21.5%
in 2019
Austria rank
150th
Malta rank
147th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Austria
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 21.5% against 20.6% in Austria, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 150th and Malta ranks 147th of 191 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Austria or Malta?
- Malta, at 21.5% against 20.6% in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Austria and Malta?
- 0.9%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Austria ranks 150th and Malta ranks 147th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.