Australia vs Denmark: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Australia
23.2%
in 2019
Denmark
23.3%
in 2019
Australia rank
128th
Denmark rank
127th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Australia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 23.3% against 23.2% in Australia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 128th and Denmark ranks 127th of 188 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.1% | 23.7% | 1.6% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 23.1% | 23.3% | 0.2% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Australia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 23.3% against 23.2% in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Australia and Denmark?
- 0.1%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Australia ranks 128th and Denmark ranks 127th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.