Armenia vs Finland: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Armenia
16.0%
in 2019
Finland
16.2%
in 2019
Armenia rank
177th
Finland rank
175th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Armenia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 16.2% against 16.0% in Armenia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 177th and Finland ranks 175th of 191 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.0% | 13.3% | 7.7% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 17.5% | 15.9% | 1.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Armenia or Finland?
- Finland, at 16.2% against 16.0% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Armenia and Finland?
- 0.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Finland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Finland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Armenia ranks 177th and Finland ranks 175th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.