Argentina vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Argentina
22.5%
in 2019
Kazakhstan
22.0%
in 2019
Argentina rank
138th
Kazakhstan rank
141st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Argentina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 22.5% against 22.0% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Argentina ranks 138th and Kazakhstan ranks 141st of 190 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.5% | 22.0% | 5.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 22.0% | 1.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Argentina or Kazakhstan?
- Argentina, at 22.5% against 22.0% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.5%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Argentina ranks 138th and Kazakhstan ranks 141st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.