Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Ukraine: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Ukraine
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
43rd
Ukraine rank
43rd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Ukraine
0123201520172019

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Ukraine, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 43rd and Ukraine ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Ukraine?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Ukraine as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Ukraine?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Ukraine?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Ukraine rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 43rd and Ukraine ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.