New Zealand vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

New Zealand
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
43rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
43rd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123201520172019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 43rd of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), New Zealand or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
New Zealand, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
New Zealand ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/new-zealand/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/new-zealand/st-kitts-and-nevis/">New Zealand vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.