New Zealand vs Slovenia, Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

New Zealand
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Slovenia, Republic of
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
43rd
Slovenia, Republic of rank
43rd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Slovenia, Republic of
0123201520172019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Slovenia, Republic of, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 43rd and Slovenia, Republic of ranks 43rd of 190 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), New Zealand or Slovenia, Republic of?
New Zealand, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Slovenia, Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between New Zealand and Slovenia, Republic of?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia, Republic of?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do New Zealand and Slovenia, Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
New Zealand ranks 43rd and Slovenia, Republic of ranks 43rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Slovenia, Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/new-zealand/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/new-zealand/slovenia/">New Zealand vs Slovenia, Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.