Mongolia vs Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time
- Mongolia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.15 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 0.15 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 114th and Pakistan ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Mongolia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 1.15 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Mongolia and Pakistan?
- 0.15 DB16-20 methodology, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Pakistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Mongolia ranks 114th and Pakistan ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.