Micronesia (country) vs Myanmar: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Micronesia (country)
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Myanmar
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
114th
Myanmar rank
114th

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Myanmar
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Myanmar, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Micronesia (country) ranks 114th and Myanmar ranks 114th of 188 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Micronesia (country) or Myanmar?
Micronesia (country), at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Micronesia (country) and Myanmar?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Myanmar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Myanmar rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Micronesia (country) ranks 114th and Myanmar ranks 114th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.