Madagascar vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Madagascar
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Marshall Islands
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Madagascar rank
72nd
Marshall Islands rank
72nd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Marshall Islands
00.511.52201520172019

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 72nd and Marshall Islands ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Madagascar or Marshall Islands?
Madagascar, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Madagascar and Marshall Islands?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Marshall Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Madagascar and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Madagascar ranks 72nd and Marshall Islands ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.