Jordan vs Morocco: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time
- Jordan
- Morocco
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Morocco, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 72nd and Morocco ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Jordan or Morocco?
- Jordan, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Jordan and Morocco?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Morocco?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Morocco rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Jordan ranks 72nd and Morocco ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.