Djibouti vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Djibouti
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kazakhstan
5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
Kazakhstan rank
4th

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Djibouti
  • Kazakhstan
012345201520172019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Djibouti, a difference of 4.5 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 10.0 times Djibouti's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 1 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Djibouti or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Djibouti and Kazakhstan?
4.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kazakhstan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Djibouti and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.