Cyprus vs São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time
- Cyprus
- São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 96th and São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of ranks 96th of 190 countries.
São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Cyprus or São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of?
- Cyprus, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Cyprus and São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Cyprus ranks 96th and São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of ranks 96th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.