Costa Rica vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Costa Rica
3.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Puerto Rico
3.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
32nd
Puerto Rico rank
32nd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Puerto Rico
01234201520172019

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 3.5 DB16-20 methodology against 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 32nd and Puerto Rico ranks 32nd of 190 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Costa Rica or Puerto Rico?
Costa Rica, at 3.5 DB16-20 methodology against 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Costa Rica and Puerto Rico?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Puerto Rico?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and Puerto Rico rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Costa Rica ranks 32nd and Puerto Rico ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/costa-rica/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/costa-rica/puerto-rico-us/">Costa Rica vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.