Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 96th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th of 190 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 96th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.